白俄罗斯皮划艇协会与国际皮划艇联合会体育仲裁案例评述
Comment on the Sport Arbitration Case between the Belarus Canoe Association and International Canoe Federation
投稿时间:2018-01-15  
DOI:
中文关键词:兴奋剂  代谢时间  集体禁赛  听证权
英文关键词:doping  metabolic duration  group suspension  right to be heard
基金项目:国家社科基金项目(17BTY007)
作者单位E-mail
邵沁雨 苏州大学 王健法学院 2833008499@qq.com 
摘要点击次数: 236
全文下载次数: 449
中文摘要:
      通过对2016年白俄罗斯皮划艇协会与国际皮划艇联合会体育仲裁案例的分析,得出研究结论:禁用药物超长的代谢时间不能成为反兴奋剂规则具有溯及力的理由;虽然《世界反兴奋剂条例》第11条的规定因为存在"集体项目"这一前提而没有违反个人责任原则,但该条第12条由于规定得过于简单仍然违反了该原则;国家司法机关刑事诉讼程序中发现的兴奋剂药物证据,在刑事诉讼程序终止而证据未经质证的情况下,不能直接作为兴奋剂违规行为的认定证据。
英文摘要:
      Through the analysis of the sport arbitration case between the Belarus Canoe Association and ICF, we came to a conclusion that the banned drug's overlong metabolic time cannot be the reason for anti-doping rules to have a retroactive effect. Though the provision of article 11 of WADC does not violate the principle of personal responsibility because of the premise of "team sports", article 12 of WADC still violates the principle by being too simple. The evidence of doping drug found in the criminal proceeding of the state judiciary cannot directly become the evidence of recognition of doping violations in the case of the criminal proceeding having been terminated without the court cross-examination.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭