动力性与静力性核心力量训练对青年羽毛球运动员躯干旋转力量及稳定性的影响

Effects of Dynamic and Static Core Strength Training on Trunk Rotational Force and Stability in Young Badminton Athletes

投稿时间：2022-01-07

DOI：10.12064/ssr.2022010701

中文关键词:核心力量训练动力性静力性躯干旋转力量躯干稳定性羽毛球

英文关键词:core strength training dynamic static trunk rotational strength trunk stability badminton

基金项目:上海市体育科技项目备战攻关计划(22J006)

作者	单位
张栋	上海市竞技体育训练管理中心,上海 202162
姚璐	上海市青浦佳禾小学,上海 201799
曹晓东	武汉体育学院,湖北武汉 430079
任雪	上海体育科学研究所(上海市反兴奋剂中心),上海 200030
陈贞祥	上海体育科学研究所(上海市反兴奋剂中心),上海 200030 ；上海体育学院,上海 200438

摘要点击次数: 1186

全文下载次数: 1136

中文摘要:

目的：通过比较动力性与静力性核心力量训练在青年羽毛球运动员躯干旋转力量及稳定性的训练效果差异，为其提供针对性训练策略。方法：采用实验法将20名(男女各10名)上海羽毛球队一级运动员随机分配到动力组(n=10)和静力组(n=10)进行12周干预，干预前后分别进行等速肌力和生物反馈动作控制测试。结果：(1)干预后，动力组在60(°)/s的等速测试与干预前以及干预后的静力组相比，躯干向左、向右旋转的最大力矩显著增加(P＜0.05)，平均功率和最大功率也有一定程度的增加，但尚未达到显著性水平；在180(°)/s的等速数据中的平均功率、最大力矩和最大功率指标与干预前以及与干预后的静力组相比，均有显著性增加(P＜0.05)；干预后，静力组的60(°)/s和180(°)/s的等速测试中3项指标与干预前、干预后相比均无显著性差异(P＞0.05)；(2)干预后，最大稳定角度与干预前以及干预后2组对比，动力组在45°、135°、-135°、-45°方向上优于静力组(P＜0.05)，静力组在0°、90°、180°、-90°方向上优于动力组(P＜0.05)。结论：静力性核心力量训练不能显著提升青年羽毛球运动员躯干旋转力量；动力性核心力量训练可以提升青年羽毛球运动员躯干慢速旋转力量的最大力矩，以及快速力量的最大力矩、平均功率、最大功率；静力性和动力性核心力量训练分别在某些关节角度增加核心稳定性，两者结合是提升躯干稳定性的有效方法，可根据运动员的个性化需求选择。

英文摘要:

Objective: To provide targeted training strategies and enrich core training theory by comparing the differences between dynamic and static core strength training effects on trunk rotational strength and stability in young badminton players. Methods: An experimental method was used to randomly assign 20 (10 male and 10 female) first-level athletes from Shanghai Badminton Team to the dynamic (n=10) and static groups (n=10) for 12 weeks of intervention, and isometric muscle strength and BFMC tests were performed before and after the intervention. Results: (1) Compared with its pre-intervention and with the post-intervention static group, the dynamic group showed a significant increase in the maximum moment of trunk rotation to the left and right(P＜0.05) in the isokinetic data at 60(°)/s after the intervention, and a certain degree of increase in mean work and maximum work which had not yet reached the significance level. The mean work, maximum moment and maximum work indexes of the dynamic group in the isokinetic data at 180 (°)/s significantly increased compared with its pre-intervention and with those of static group after the intervention(P＜0.05). after the intervention, the three indicators in the isokinetic test at 60 (°)/s and 180 (°)/s in the static group were not significantly different from their pre- and post-intervention counterparts, respectively (P＞0.05); (2) In the BFMC test, the dynamic group showed a significant increase in the 45°, 135°, -135°, -45° directions, and the static group showed a significant increase in the 0°, 90°, 180°, -90° directions compared to the dynamic group(P＜0.05). Conclusion: Static core strength training cannot significantly improve trunk rotational strength; dynamic core strength training can improve the maximum moment of slow rotational strength, as well as the maximum moment, average work and maximum work of fast strength in young badminton players; static and dynamic core strength training increase core stability in certain joint angles respectively, and the combination of both is an effective way to improve trunk stability. One method can also be chosen according to the individual needs of the athlete.

查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器

关闭