有无正当理由违约中的损害赔偿——从案例分析的角度

Compensation for damages in case of breach of contract with or without just cause

DOI：

英文关键词:Breach of Contract Compensation for Damage Just Cause

基金项目:

作者	单位
Lucas Ferrer（西班牙）	Spain Pintó Ruiz & Del Valle律师事务所
杨蓓蕾，译

摘要点击次数: 4120

全文下载次数: 3830

中文摘要:

通过对国际体育仲裁违约合同造成损害赔偿的案例分析，提出没有固定的规则可以适用所有的案例，唯一确定的是所谓的“积极利益”或“预期利益”原则。因此，裁定方确定赔偿金是以假设违约未发生，受害方应当获得利益大小为标准。任何人都不应当试图创设一个固定规则，因为尝试创设规则是不明智的，它将导致裁定方因固定规则被迫以某种方式裁定，并不能实现双方当事人及体育领域所追求的公正、合理的结果。文章认为由裁定方在考虑到所有情形的前提以积极利益原则为首要原则确定最合适的赔偿金。

英文摘要:

This paper by analysis CAS cases of breach of contract, Put forward that there is no fixed rule that is applicable to all cases. The only thing that exists is the principle of the so-called“positive interest”or “expectation interest”. Accordingly, a deciding body will aim at determining an amount which shall basically put the damaged party in the position that the same party would have had if no contractual breach had occurred. Trying to create a fixed rule would be unwisely and would at the end lead to a situation in which a deciding body is forced to decide in a certain way because of the fixed rule while the most desirable outcome for both parties and the sport world is more served with an outcome which feels fair and is rational.

查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器

关闭