身份、地位、品格：体育社会科学的三个元问题

Identity, Status and Character: The Three Meta Problems of Sport Social Science

DOI：

英文关键词:sport social science sport science sport humanity science meta-theory scientism value

基金项目:国家哲学社会科学基金课题（06BTY002）；上海市哲学社会科学规划课题（2014BTY002）

作者	单位	E-mail
熊文	华东师范大学体育与健康学院	xiong2001wen@sina.com

摘要点击次数: 3664

全文下载次数: 5326

中文摘要:

从体育社会科学的3个元问题展开讨论，即体育社会科学存在身份不明、地位缺失和品格同化的三重危机。认为：（1）体育社会科学，尤其是其中体育人文科学的“科学”身份还未被认可。其纳入科学范畴可从多个方面因素予以考察，并统一于体育社会科学作为社会科学的分支等方面；（2）当前，体育社会科学的有关语境（对体育、体育科学的界定，体育科学性质及分类）未能反映、揭示或包容体育社会科学及其属性，其很大程度上不能与体育社会科学兼容；（3）体育社会科学内含的价值分析、宏观-抽象学说、经验定性研究、效度和信度问题使得其思维模式、研究范式与体育自然-人体科学存在相异，“规律”的诉求对体育社会科学不具有普适性，而应体现学科、研究差异，且与价值考量保持合理张力。

英文摘要:

This paper centers around three meta problems, i.e., the three crises of sport social science: the identity is uncertain; the status is absent; the character is assimilated. The conclusions are as follows: (1)The identity of “science” for sport social science, especially sport humanity science, is not yet ascertained. The factors concerning taking sport social science as “science” can be studied seriously, and it may be included in a certain branch of social science. (2) At present, the related context(the definition of sport andsport science, the nature and classification of sport science) cannot reflect, reveal or contain sport social science and its attribute. To a large extent, it cannot be compatible with sport social science. (3)The value analysis, macro-abstract doctrine, experience qualitative study and the problems of validity and reliability included in sport social science make it different from sport natural-somatic science in terms of thinking mode and research paradigm. The appeal for law is not applicable to sport social science. The difference of subject and research should be reflected in sport social science, which should be balanced rationally with value consideration.

查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器

关闭