国际体育仲裁院援引先例的中国启示

China's Response to CAS's Citing Precedent Arbitration Practice

投稿时间：2023-07-10

DOI：10.12064/ssr.2023071001

英文关键词:precedents arbitration precedents precedent citation Court of Arbitration for Sport

基金项目:国家社会科学基金青年项目（20CTY010）

作者	单位
王迪	苏州大学王健法学院，江苏苏州 215006

摘要点击次数: 878

全文下载次数: 1024

中文摘要:

国际体育仲裁院（CAS）从成立以来在各类案件的仲裁中频繁援引先例，并坚持用先例中的论证进行裁决，这种仲裁实践已经成为CAS在国际体育纠纷解决中的常态，在CAS涉中国当事人案件中更是如此。纵观近些年CAS涉中国当事人案的整体与个案，CAS援引先例的实践切实存在，不断影响着中国当事人与中国体育仲裁的发展。面对CAS援引先例的仲裁实践，中国当事人在国际体育纠纷仲裁过程中，应当发挥主动性，坚持提出先例的权利以及获取CAS援引先例理由的权利，并做好援引先例的前期准备和先例研究工作，同时中国需要重视CAS援引先例的仲裁实践，培养专门的研究人员，以CAS为范例建立体育仲裁机制。

英文摘要:

Since its establishment, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has frequently cited the precedent of its own arbitration in all kinds of cases and insisted on ruling with the arguments in the precedent. This arbitration practice has become the norm of CAS in the settlement of international sports disputes, especially in cases involving China parties. In recent years, in the whole and individual cases of CAS involving China parties, the practice of CAS citing precedents actually exists, which continuously affects China athletes and the development of sports arbitration. Facing the arbitration practice of CAS citing precedents, China parties should take the initiative in arbitration, insist on the right to put forward precedents and the right to obtain the reasons for the CAS to cite precedents, and complete the preparatory work and precedent research for citing precedents. At the same time, China should learn from the arbitration practice of CAS citing precedents, train specialized researchers and establish a sports arbitration mechanism with CAS as an example.

查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器

关闭