|
| 论足球合同违约体育制裁及CAS裁判法理 |
| On Sports Sanctions for Football Contract Breach and CAS Adjudication Jurisprudence |
| 投稿时间：2023-10-27 |
| DOI：10.12064/ssr.2023102701 |
| 中文关键词:足球 合同违约 体育制裁 国际体育仲裁院 裁判法理 |
| 英文关键词:football contract breach sports sanction Court of Arbitration for Sport adjudication jurisprudence |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目（21BTY058） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 93 |
| 全文下载次数: 131 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 足球合同违约不仅导致赔偿，还可能引发体育制裁。将此类由体育制裁引发的争议提交至国际体育仲裁院（Court of Arbitration for Sport, CAS），须将足球主管机构作为被诉方。在审查此类案件中，仲裁庭首先确认合同违约是否发生在保护期内；对违约球员、违约俱乐部和诱导球员违约俱乐部施加的体育制裁不同，仲裁庭的审查要件和裁判标准也存在区别。在处理此类案件的过程中，CAS尊重足球主管机构在体育制裁方面的裁量权，同时确保这一裁量权的行使正当及在合理范围之内。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Breach of football contract not only leads to compensation, but also may trigger sports sanction. To submit disputes arising from sports sanction to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), the football regulatory authority must act as the defendant. In reviewing such cases, the CAS Panel firstly confirms whether the breach of contract occurs during the protection period. The sports sanction imposed on players and clubs are different, thus there are differences in the review requirements and referee standards of CAS. In dealing with such cases, CAS respects the discretion of football regulatory authority in such sports sanctions, while ensuring that the exercise of this discretion is legitimate and within a reasonable range. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 Download PDF reader |
| 关闭 |
