| On the basis of the present training science, we describe the research and design of the quality of the sports training, which will surely be considered as an exception to the subjects guided by quantity in the natural science. Accordingly, our aim is to obtain the understanding of the training objects. In the eyes of the coaches, the research is very complicated. In other words, the focus of the study is not the perspective of the researchers, but is mainly related to the viewpoint of the research objects. The research studies the importance of athletes’ subjective condition in the course of training. The key of the study is to explore an applicable research mode for the knowledge that is not suitable for standardized research. The survey nearly covers all the phases of the training of the youngsters. Due to the standardized and clear-object interview form, the aim of the survey has been achieved satisfactorily. The result of the study realistically features the inner characteristics of the training system of junior competitive sports and makes a comparative analysis of the rational degrees of these characteristics of the different sports. Compared to the method of quantitative research, this study on the main concept of successful youth training lays stress on the characteristics of qualitative research. The ways of survey and analysis adopted in the study are characterized by exploration, reconstruction and theory formation. However, the logic of the subjective theory of a successful coach of the junior athletes totally has reversed the pre-chosen theme structure of the research. The author is now more convinced of his opinion, which means it is necessary to make more interventional studies through experiments based on objective cognition and investigation so as to clarify some undefined minor problems. Besides, it is not possible for us to analyze systematically the training course of the youngsters with routine activity theories from the aspect of scientific training without taking into account of the factors of pedagogy, psychology, sociology and so on. |
