|
| 2018年雅加达亚运会体育仲裁实践述评——兼论《亚奥理事会章程》中争议解决规则的缺陷与完善 |
| Review of Arbitration Awards at the 18th Asian Games: On Defects and Perfection of the Dispute Resolution Rules in the Constitution of the Olympic Council of Asia |
| Received:December 12, 2018 |
| DOI：10.12064/ssr.20190202 |
| 中文关键词:亚运会 体育仲裁 国际体育仲裁院 规则 |
| 英文关键词:Asian Games sports arbitration Court of Arbitration for Sport rule |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目（17BTY007） |
|
| Hits: 2085 |
| Download times: 2074 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 国际体育仲裁院特别仲裁处（CAS AHD）在雅加达亚运会期间仲裁了3起案件。特别仲裁处仲裁庭通过合理运用解释方法填补了《亚奥理事会章程》中争议解决规则的漏洞，对仲裁庭自身管辖范围进行扩大，保障了未取得正式参赛资格的运动员和国家（地区）体育协会的诉权。但仲裁裁决无法从根本上改变有缺陷的争议解决规则。这种有缺陷的规则不符合奥林匹克运动追求善治的趋势，应参考其他区域性大型体育赛事的经验进行修改。第三方体育仲裁机构通过发挥准司法能动性，能够帮助完善体育自治。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The ad hoc Division of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS AHD) decided three cases at the 18th Asian Games. The CAS AHD filled the loopholes in the dispute resolution rules in the Constitution and Rules of the Olympic Council of Asia, expanded its own jurisdiction, and protected the rights of athletes and national/regional sports associations without eligibility. However, the awards issued by CAS AHD could not fundamentally change the flawed dispute resolution rules. These flawed rules are not in line with the Olympic Movement's pursuit of good governance and should be revised with reference to the rules of other regional sports events. Third-party sports arbitration institutions can help improve sports autonomy by giving play to quasi-judicial initiative. |
| View Full Text View/Add Comment Download PDF reader |
| Close |
