球场观众替代性羞耻情绪的结构探索与问卷编制
Structure Exploration and Questionnaire Development of Field Spectators' Vicarious Shame
Received:June 10, 2022  
DOI:10.12064/ssr.2022061001
中文关键词:替代性羞耻  问卷  混合方法  球场观众  本土化研究
英文关键词:vicarious shame  questionnaire  mixed method  field spectator  indigenous research
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目青年基金(21YJCZH103)
Author NameAffiliation
MA Hong School of Education, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong 030619 , China 
REN Lei School of PhysicalEducation, Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan 030000 , China 
Hits: 1276
Download times: 1133
中文摘要:
      目的:探索本土文化背景下球场观众替代性羞耻情绪的概念结构,编制球场观众替代性羞耻情绪问卷,并检验该问卷的信效度。方法:采用混合研究方法,通过访谈法和主题分析法探索球场观众替代性羞耻情绪的概念结构,编制问卷,采用整群结合方便抽样原则,以全国917名球场观众为对象进行问卷调查,并对问卷结构的测量学指标进行检验。结果:(1)球场观众替代性羞耻认知体验问卷、情绪感受问卷和行为倾向问卷的项目鉴别力均较好,各问卷及其维度的内部一致性信度和分半信度均较好,3个分问卷的内容效度和结构效度拟合指标也较好。(2)球场观众替代性羞耻认知体验问卷包含主体消极评价和内群形象威胁2个维度,共7题;球场观众替代性羞耻情绪感受问卷为单维结构,共5题;球场观众替代性羞耻行为倾向问卷包含负性行为修复和掩饰与回避2个维度,共6题。结论:球场观众替代性羞耻情绪的3个面向可分别通过球场观众替代性羞耻认知体验问卷、球场观众替代性羞耻情绪感受问卷和球场观众替代性羞耻行为倾向问卷测量,3个分问卷及其构成的总问卷具有良好的信度和效度,可作为相关研究的有效测量工具。
英文摘要:
      Objective: To explore the structure of the field spectators' vicarious shame in indigenous cultural background, to develop questionnaires, and to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaires. Methods: The mixed method was adopted. Firstly, the structure of the field spectators' vicarious shame was explored and questionnaires were developed by interview and thematic analysis methods. Then, a combination of the principle of cluster and convenient sampling was adopted to carry out a questionnaire survey among 917 field spectators nationwide, and the measurement indexes of the questionnaires' structure were tested. Results: (1)Each item in the Field Spectators' Vicarious Shame Cognitive Experience Questionnaire (FSVS-CEQ), the Field Spectators' Vicarious Shame Feeling Questionnaire (FSVS-FQ), and the Field Spectators' Vicarious Shame Behavior Tendency Questionnaire (FSVS-BTQ) showed good discriminability. The internal consistency reliability and the split-half reliability of each questionnaire and its dimensions were good. The content validity and the construct validity of the three questionnaires were good, too. (2)The FSVS-CEQ includes 7 items with 2 dimensions of subjective negative evaluation and in-group image threat; the FSVS-FQ includes 5 items with a single dimension; the FSVS-BTQ includes 6 items with 2 dimensions of negative behavior repair and cover-up and avoidance. Conclusion: The three aspects of the field spectators' vicarious shame can be measured by the FSVS-CEQ, the FSVS-FQ, and the FSVS-BTQ respectively. The three subquestionnaires and the total questionnaire have good reliability and validity, and can be used as effective measurement tools for related studies.
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download PDF reader
Close
Download Top 30
Click Top 30
Cite Top 30